Key result
Cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment interventions have limited evidence of effectiveness among lower socioeconomic groups, with social and environmental factors acting as significant barriers.
Why the study?
Are key interventions for CVD prevention and treatment effective among lower socioeconomic groups?
Are key interventions for CVD prevention and treatment effective among lower socioeconomic groups?
Current evidence-based CVD prevention and treatment strategies have limited proven effectiveness in lower socioeconomic groups, potentially widening the socioeconomic-CVD gradient due to unaddressed social and environmental barriers.
May widen CVD disparities without adaptation; leaves open targeted trials addressing social barriers.
BACKGROUND: Despite declining rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in developed countries, lower socioeconomic groups continue to experience a greater burden of the disease. There are now many evidence-based treatments and prevention strategies for the management of CVD and it is essential that their impact on the more disadvantaged group is understood if socioeconomic inequalities in CVD are to be reduced. AIMS: To determine whether key interventions for CVD prevention and treatment are effective among lower socioeconomic groups, to describe barriers to their effectiveness and the potential or actual impact of these interventions on the socioeconomic gradient in CVD. METHODS: Interventions were selected from four stages of the CVD continuum. These included smoking reduction strategies, absolute risk assessment, cardiac rehabilitation, secondary prevention medications, and heart failure self-management programmes. Electronic searches were conducted using terms for each intervention combined with terms for socioeconomic status (SES). RESULTS: Only limited evidence was found for the effectiveness of the selected interventions among lower SES groups and there was little exploration of socioeconomic-related barriers to their uptake. Some broad themes and key messages were identified. In the majority of findings examined, it was clear that the underlying material, social and environmental factors associated with disadvantage are a significant barrier to the effectiveness of interventions. CONCLUSION: Opportunities to reduce socioeconomic inequalities occur at all stages of the CVD continuum. Despite this, current treatment and prevention strategies may be contributing to the widening socioeconomic-CVD gradient. Further research into the impact of best-practice interventions for CVD upon lower SES groups is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beauchamp et al. (2010) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment interventions was evaluated. Cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment interventions have limited evidence of effectiveness among lower socioeconomic groups, with social and environmental factors acting as significant barriers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: