Key result
Guideline treatment decreased total carotid artery wall volume by 9.6% over 2 years in patients with type II diabetes (p=0.016), compared to stabilization in non-diabetic patients.
Why the study?
Does guideline-directed cardiovascular risk management treatment reduce carotid artery wall dimensions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus compared to non-diabetic patients?
Cohort (n=59)
Does guideline-directed cardiovascular risk management treatment reduce carotid artery wall dimensions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus compared to non-diabetic patients?
p-value: p=0.016
Guideline-directed cardiovascular risk management leads to regression of carotid atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes and stabilization in non-diabetic patients.
Carotid wall changes may differ by diabetes status post-CVD event; leaves open impact on event rates or regimen efficacy.
BACKGROUND: Efficacy of guideline cardiovascular disease prevention regimens may differ between patients with or without type II diabetes mellitus. We therefore compared change in carotid artery wall dimensions in type II diabetes mellitus and non-type II diabetes mellitus patients with a history of a major cardiovascular disease event, using magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: Thirty type II diabetes mellitus patients and 29 age- and sex-matched non-diabetes mellitus patients with a history of stroke or myocardial infarction and a carotid artery stenosis (15%-70%) were included. In all patients, treatment was according to cardiovascular risk management guidelines. At baseline and follow-up, carotid artery vessel wall dimensions were measured using 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: After 2 years of follow-up, total wall volume of the carotid artery in type II diabetes mellitus patients decreased by 9.6% (p = 0.016). In contrast, stabilization rather than regression of carotid artery wall dimensions was observed in non-diabetes mellitus patients over a 2-year period. Body mass index was identified as a predictor of total wall volume decrease. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline treatment arrests atherogenesis in non-diabetes mellitus patients and even decreases vessel wall dimensions in type II diabetes mellitus patients. Baseline body mass index predicts cardiovascular disease prevention efficacy expressed as decrease in total wall volume. These data emphasize the importance of optimal cardiovascular-prevention, particularly in diabetes patients with a high body mass index.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Strang et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease with carotid artery stenosis (n=59). Type II diabetes mellitus vs. Non-type II diabetes mellitus was evaluated on Change in total wall volume of the carotid artery (p=0.016). Guideline treatment decreased total carotid artery wall volume by 9.6% over 2 years in patients with type II diabetes (p=0.016), compared to stabilization in non-diabetic patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: