Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hydrolysis of β- d -mannosides by β-mannosidases typically proceeds via a B 2,5 transition state conformation for the pyranoside ring, while that of β- d -glucosides by β-glucosidases proceeds through a distinct 4 H 3 transition state conformation. However, rice Os7BGlu26 β-glycosidase hydrolyzes 4-nitrophenyl β- d -glucoside and β- d -mannoside with similar efficiencies. The origin of this dual substrate specificity was investigated by kinetic, structural, and computational approaches. The glycosidase inhibitors glucoimidazole and mannoimidazole inhibited Os7BGlu26 with K i values of 2.7 nM and 10.4 μM, respectively. In X-ray crystal structures of complexes with Os7BGlu26, glucoimidazole bound to the active site in a 4 E conformation, while mannoimidazole bound in a B 2,5 conformation, suggesting different transition state conformations. Moreover, calculation of quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) free energy landscapes showed that 4-nitrophenyl β- d -glucoside adopts a 1 S 3 / 4 E conformation in the Michaelis complex, while 4-nitrophenyl β- d -mannoside adopts a 1 S 5 / B 2,5 conformation. The QM/MM simulations of Os7BGlu26 catalysis of hydrolysis also supported the itineraries of 1 S 3 → 4 E / 4 H 3 ⧧ → 4 C 1 for β- d -glucosides and 1 S 5 → B 2,5 ⧧ → O S 2 for β- d -mannosides, thereby revealing that a single glycoside hydrolase can hydrolyze glycosides of different configurations via distinct transition state pyranoside conformations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tankrathok et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: