Key result
Invasive electrophysiology study identified additional electrophysiologic diagnoses in 26% of pediatric patients with atrial fibrillation, and 21% underwent successful ablation with no AF recurrence.
Why the study?
AF is uncommon in pediatric populations and increases comorbidities, creating a critical need to investigate and potentially eliminate alternate etiologies.
Does invasive electrophysiology study identify treatable alternate substrates in healthy pediatric patients presenting with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=19)
No
Does invasive electrophysiology study identify treatable alternate substrates in healthy pediatric patients presenting with atrial fibrillation?
In healthy pediatric patients presenting with atrial fibrillation, an electrophysiology study can identify treatable alternate substrates (such as AVRT or AVNRT) in approximately a quarter of cases, allowing for successful ablation and elimination of AF.
Pediatric AF warrants etiologic workup beyond adult risk factors; observational data support hypothesis-generating comparisons but should not yet change practice.
INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a very common tachyarrhythmia with increasing prevalence with age, but uncommon in the pediatric population. Understanding that AF increases comorbidities make the need for investigation and potential elimination of alternate etiologies in pediatric AF patients critical. The objective of this study was to review our institutional data and compare our findings with previously documented adult AF risk factors to pediatric patients while also identifying which patients had alternate electrophysiology diagnoses amenable to transcatheter ablation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed identifying AF patients who were less than 21 years old, had no significant congenital cardiovascular anomalies, a documented episode of AF on electrocardiogram and underwent invasive electrophysiology study (EPS). RESULTS: (Z-scores -0.81 ± 1.50), indicating no dilation. Five of nineteen patients (26%) had additional electrophysiologic diagnoses during EPS, including atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (n = 2, 10%) and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (n = 3, 16%). Four patients underwent successful ablation with no documented or clinical AF recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Adult risk factors of male predominance and obesity were seen in pediatric AF patients, while left atrial enlargement was not. Twenty-one percent of the pediatric AF patients who had additional electrophysiologic substrates and successful ablations resulted in no further clinical episodes of AF. This suggests that pediatric patients presenting with AF might benefit from an EPS as part of a complete evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orr et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=19). Invasive electrophysiology study (EPS) was evaluated on Additional electrophysiologic diagnoses during EPS. Invasive electrophysiology study identified additional electrophysiologic diagnoses in 26% of pediatric patients with atrial fibrillation, and 21% underwent successful ablation with no AF recurrence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: