Key result
Latino patients with Ewing sarcoma had similar 5-year event-free survival compared to non-Latino patients (60.5% vs. 50.9%, P=0.37), despite presenting at a younger age with impaired healthcare access.
Why the study?
Does Latino ethnicity affect clinical characteristics, healthcare access, and survival outcomes in patients with Ewing sarcoma compared to non-Latino ethnicity?
Cohort (n=218)
Yes
Does Latino ethnicity affect clinical characteristics, healthcare access, and survival outcomes in patients with Ewing sarcoma compared to non-Latino ethnicity?
Absolute Event Rate: 60.5% vs 50.9%
p-value: p=0.37
Latino patients with Ewing sarcoma present younger and have impaired healthcare access, but achieve similar survival outcomes compared to non-Latino patients.
Comparable survival despite access barriers should not yet change practice; leaves open whether ethnicity-specific factors influence Ewing sarcoma outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a malignancy of bone and soft tissue in children and adults. Previous registry-based studies indicate that Latino patients with ES have inferior outcomes compared to non-Latino patients, though an etiology for this difference could not be identified. To explore possible differences that might underlie this disparity, we conducted a retrospective study to compare clinical characteristics, tumor features, healthcare access, and treatment outcomes between Latino and non-Latino patients with ES. METHODS: Primary data for 218 ES patients treated at two academic medical centers between 1980 and 2010 were collected. Categorical data were compared using Fisher exact tests; Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for continuous variables. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using log-rank testing. RESULTS: Latino patients were diagnosed at a younger age (P = 0.014). All other clinical and histological data were similar between groups, including radiologic and histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Latino patients had lower socioeconomic status (P = 0.001), were less likely to have insurance (P = 0.001), and were more likely to present to the emergency room at onset of symptoms (P = 0.031) rather than to primary care physicians. Five-year event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar between Latino and non-Latino patients (EFS: 60.5% vs. 50.9% P = 0.37; OS: 77.6% vs. 68.6% P = 0.54). CONCLUSION: Latino patients with ES present at a younger age, and have evidence of impaired access to healthcare. Response to initial therapy appears similar between Latino and non-Latino patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharib et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Ewing sarcoma (n=218). Latino ethnicity vs. non-Latino ethnicity was evaluated on Five-year event free survival (EFS) (p=0.37). Latino patients with Ewing sarcoma had similar 5-year event-free survival compared to non-Latino patients (60.5% vs. 50.9%, P=0.37), despite presenting at a younger age with impaired healthcare access.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: