Key result
The pattern of interruption of chronic aspirin therapy before major non-cardiac surgery was not predictive of perioperative cardiovascular complications or bleeding complications.
Why the study?
Does the timing of antithrombotic therapy interruption affect the risk of perioperative cardiovascular or bleeding complications in patients with known cardiovascular disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery?
Cohort (n=1,200)
No
Does the timing of antithrombotic therapy interruption affect the risk of perioperative cardiovascular or bleeding complications in patients with known cardiovascular disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery?
Odds Ratio: 1.87 (95% CI 0.84–4.13)
p-value: p=n.s.
In high-risk patients with cardiovascular disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery, baseline clinical factors are better predictors of perioperative complications than the timing of aspirin interruption.
Aspirin interruption patterns should not guide perioperative risk assessment; leaves open optimal strategy in observational data.
BACKGROUND: Interruption of antithrombotic treatment before surgery may prevent bleeding, but at the price of increasing cardiovascular complications. This prospective study analysed the impact of antithrombotic therapy interruption on outcomes in non-selected surgical patients with known cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS: All 1200 consecutive patients (age 74.2 ± 10.2 years) undergoing major non-cardiac surgery (37.4 % acute, 61.4 % elective) during a period of 2.5 years while having at least one CVD were enrolled. Details on medication, bleeding, cardiovascular complications and cause of death were registered. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 3.9 % (versus 0.9 % mortality among 17,740 patients without CVD). Cardiovascular complications occurred in 91 (7.6 %) patients (with 37.4 % case fatality). Perioperative bleeding occurred in 160 (13.3 %) patients and was fatal in 2 (1.2 % case fatality). Multivariate analysis revealed age, preoperative anaemia, history of chronic heart failure, acute surgery and general anaesthesia predictive of cardiovascular complications. For bleeding complications multivariate analysis found warfarin use in the last 3 days, history of hypertension and general anaesthesia as independent predictive factors. Aspirin interruption before surgery was not predictive for either cardiovascular or for bleeding complications. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative cardiovascular complications in these high-risk elderly all-comer surgical patients with known cardiovascular disease are relatively rare, but once they occur, the case fatality is high. Perioperative bleeding complications are more frequent, but their case fatality is extremely low. Patterns of interruption of chronic aspirin therapy before major non-cardiac surgery are not predictive for perioperative complications (neither cardiovascular, nor bleeding). Simple baseline clinical factors are better predictors of outcomes than antithrombotic drug interruption patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Widimský et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Known cardiovascular disease undergoing major non-cardiac surgery (n=1,200). Interruption of antithrombotic therapy (aspirin) vs. Continuation or longer interruption (> 7 days) was evaluated on Perioperative cardiovascular complications (OR 1.87, 95% CI 0.84-4.13, p=n.s.). The pattern of interruption of chronic aspirin therapy before major non-cardiac surgery was not predictive of perioperative cardiovascular complications or bleeding complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: