Key result
The sEH inhibitor AUDA (10 μM) resulted in a 37±7% relaxation of rat mesenteric arteries, demonstrating unique vasodilator actions compared to other sEH inhibitors like CDU (4±9%) and CUDA (2±6%).
The sEH inhibitor AUDA exerts unique, structure-dependent vasodilatory effects on mesenteric resistance arteries, suggesting a microvascular mechanism for its cardiovascular protective effects.
AUDA relaxes rat mesenteric arteries; hypothesis-generating for sEH inhibition in human microvascular disease.
The epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) have been identified as EDHFs. Metabolism of the EETs to the dihydroxyeicosatrienoic acids is catalyzed by the epoxide hydrolase enzyme (sEH). Administration of urea based sEH inhibitors provides protection from hypertension‐induced renal injury at least in part by lowering blood pressure. Here, we investigated the hypothesis that a mechanism by which sEH inhibitors illicit their cardiovascular protective effects is via their action on the microvasculature. Mesenteric resistance arteries were isolated from Sprague‐Dawley rats, pressurized and constricted with U46619. Mesenteric arteries were then incubated with increasing concentrations of the sEH inhibitor 12‐(3‐adamantan‐1‐yl‐ureido)dodecanoic acid (AUDA). AUDA resulted in a concentration‐dependent relaxation of mesenteric arteries, with 10 μM resulting in a 37±7% relaxation. Chain shortened analogs of AUDA had a significantly attenuated vasodilatory response. Interstingly, at 10 μM, the cyclohexyl sEH inhibitors CDU and CUDA were relatively inactive and resulted in a 4±9% and 2±6% relaxation, respectively. Treatment of mesenteric arteries with tetraethylammonium chloride attenuated the AUDA‐induced relaxation, whereas constriction with KCl completely inhibited AUDA‐induced relaxation. Taken together, these data provide support for the hypothesis that AUDA has unique vasodilator actions compared to other sEH inhibitors and that these actions depend on the adamantyl group and carbon chain length.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olearczyk et al. (2006) studied this question. 12-(3-adamantan-1-yl-ureido)dodecanoic acid (AUDA) vs. CDU and CUDA was evaluated on relaxation of mesenteric arteries. The sEH inhibitor AUDA (10 μM) resulted in a 37±7% relaxation of rat mesenteric arteries, demonstrating unique vasodilator actions compared to other sEH inhibitors like CDU (4±9%) and CUDA (2±6%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: