Key result
Hybrid transcatheter/surgical repair for postinfarction apical VSD yielded higher survival at discharge (86% vs 56%) but similar survival at 1 year (57% vs 56%) compared to traditional surgery.
Why the study?
Postinfarction ventricular septal defect carries poor outcomes with surgical repair, motivating the evaluation of clinical outcomes with a novel hybrid transcatheter/surgical repair.
Does a novel hybrid transcatheter/surgical repair improve survival compared to traditional surgical repair in patients with postinfarction apical VSD?
Cohort (n=16)
Does a novel hybrid transcatheter/surgical repair improve survival compared to traditional surgical repair in patients with postinfarction apical VSD?
Absolute Event Rate: 57% vs 56%
A novel hybrid transcatheter/surgical repair for postinfarction apical VSD may offer improved short-term survival compared to traditional surgery and serves as a viable alternative for early intervention.
Hybrid repair appears feasible for apical post-MI VSD; hypothesis-generating and requires larger prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Postinfarction ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a catastrophic complication of myocardial infarction. Surgical repair still has poor outcomes. This report describes clinical outcomes after a novel hybrid transcatheter/surgical repair in patients with apical VSD. METHODS: Seven patients with postmyocardial infarction apical VSD underwent hybrid transcatheter repair via subxiphoid surgical access. A transcatheter occluder (Amplatzer Septal Occluder) with a trailing premounted suture was deployed through the right ventricular wall and through the ventricular septum into the left ventricular apex. The trailing suture was used to connect an anchor external to the right ventricular wall. Tension on the suture then collapses the right ventricular free wall against the septum and left ventricular occluder, thereby obliterating the VSD. Outcomes were compared with 9 patients who underwent surgical repair using either patch or primary suture closure. RESULTS: ) with ≈45% in each group requiring mechanical support preprocedurally. The procedure was done 15 (IQR, 10-50) versus 24 (IQR, 10-134) days postmyocardial infarction, respectively. Both groups of patients underwent repair with technical success and without intraprocedural death. One patient in the hybrid group and 4 in the surgical group developed multiorgan failure. The hybrid group had a higher survival at discharge (86% versus 56%) and at 30 days (71% versus 56%), but similar at 1 year (57% versus 56%). During follow-up, 1 patient in each group required reintervention for residual VSD (hybrid: 9 months versus surgical: 5 days). CONCLUSIONS: Early intervention with a hybrid transcatheter/surgical repair may be a viable alternative to traditional surgery for postinfarction apical VSD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ueyama et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Postinfarction apical ventricular septal defect (n=16). Hybrid transcatheter/surgical repair vs. Surgical repair (patch or primary suture closure) was evaluated on Survival at 1 year. Hybrid transcatheter/surgical repair for postinfarction apical VSD yielded higher survival at discharge (86% vs 56%) but similar survival at 1 year (57% vs 56%) compared to traditional surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: