Key result
New oral anticoagulants demonstrate at least equivalent efficacy to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, with an approximate 50% reduction in intracranial bleeding.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
NOACs offer equivalent efficacy to warfarin with a significant reduction in intracranial bleeding, though management of irreversible bleeding remains a clinical consideration in the emergency department.
As of September 2013, three new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are now available for clinical use on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in Australia. All three are for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, and one will also be available for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. All have been evaluated in large, multicentre randomised clinical trials. These drugs show at least equivalent efficacy to the current standard of care, the vitamin K antagonist warfarin. Major bleeding rates are overall comparable with warfarin, but there is an important reduction in intracranial bleeding of approximately 50% with all NOAC agents. The NOACs are administered in a simple, fixed dose regimen. There are a few clinically important interactions with other medications or diet. Concerns exist about the potential for irreversible bleeding in the small number of patients in which that occurs. This short report will discuss the pharmacology of these agents, the indications for use, aspects of laboratory monitoring and the management of bleeding with these agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter Wood (2013) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation, deep venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism. New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonist warfarin was evaluated. New oral anticoagulants demonstrate at least equivalent efficacy to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, with an approximate 50% reduction in intracranial bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: