Key result
Subjective estimation of heart rate by physical education students underestimated actual heart rate by a mean difference of 13.4%, with 70% of students estimating lower than true values.
Why the study?
Physical education teachers need to evaluate exercise intensity accurately, but the accuracy of subjective pre-exercise heart rate estimation across different exercises was unknown.
Does subjective pre-exercise estimation accurately reflect actual heart rate during different physical activities in physical education students?
Cross-Sectional (n=180)
Does subjective pre-exercise estimation accurately reflect actual heart rate during different physical activities in physical education students?
Physical education students can estimate their heart rate responses to a reasonable degree of accuracy, though they tend to significantly underestimate them, particularly during moderate-intensity activities.
Subjective heart rate estimates may misguide exercise intensity in students; leaves open need for objective validation in prospective studies.
Physical education teachers should be able to evaluate exercise intensity objectively as well as subjectively in order to implement the appropriate load during activity sessions. Whereas measuring oxygen uptake or blood lactate level during exercise may be a complicated task in field conditions, monitoring heart rate (HR) values can be a relatively simple procedure when performed outdoors. The aim of this study was to examine the subjective estimation accuracy of HR in different exercises among physical education students. Pre-exercise estimations of HR were collected from 180 students prior to a multi-task activity session. The estimated HR values were then compared with true HR values, which were monitored throughout the session using a portable HR monitor system. A mean significant difference of 13.4% was found between the estimated and actual HRs for all activities. A majority of the students (70%) estimated HR values to be lower than the true values. The most accurate HR estimations were found in extremely easy or in extremely difficult activities, whereas the least accurate estimations were found in moderate-level activities. No significant differences were found in HR estimation accuracy between males and females or between individuals with higher and with lower aerobic fitness. The results indicated that physical education students can estimate their HR responses to a reasonable degree of accuracy, but with most underestimating them compared to the actual values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meckel et al. (2019) reported a cross-sectional. Subjective estimation of heart rate vs. Actual heart rate was evaluated on Difference between estimated and actual heart rates (13.4% mean difference). Subjective estimation of heart rate by physical education students underestimated actual heart rate by a mean difference of 13.4%, with 70% of students estimating lower than true values.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: