Key result
The Polar F6 heart rate monitor overpredicted energy expenditure by ~2 kCal/min during bench stepping, with similar prediction errors whether arm movements were included or not (p ≥ 0.05).
Why the study?
Does the inclusion of arm movements during aerobic bench stepping impact the accuracy of the Polar F6 heart rate monitor in estimating energy expenditure in women?
Does the inclusion of arm movements during aerobic bench stepping impact the accuracy of the Polar F6 heart rate monitor in estimating energy expenditure in women?
Effect estimate: Δ∼2 kCal·min-1
p-value: p=≥ 0.05
Arm movements during aerobic bench stepping elicit a disproportionate rise in heart rate relative to VO2, but do not increase the prediction error of the Polar F6 heart rate monitor for energy expenditure.
Polar F6 accuracy unaffected by arm movements in bench stepping; extends validation evidence but leaves accuracy questions open for clinical use.
Because of the well-documented linear relationship between heart rate and oxygen consumption (VO2), heart rate is commonly used to estimate energy expenditure during exercise. However, previous research suggests that heart rate increases without a concomitant rise in VO2 when arm movements are added to exercise. If so, this could impact the accuracy of heart rate monitors in estimating energy expenditure during combined arm and leg exercise. This study compared the cardiorespiratory responses to a bench step aerobics routine performed with and without arm movements and evaluated whether the accuracy of the Polar F6 heart rate monitor in predicting energy expenditure was impacted by the inclusion of arm movements. Thirty-two women performed the same routine with and without arm movements while stepping up and down off of a 15.24-cm bench at a cadence of 128 b·min-1. Heart rate and VO2 increased, whereas oxygen pulse (VO2·heart rate-1) decreased when arm movements were added (p < 0.001). However, the differences between the energy expenditure estimated by the Polar F6 heart rate monitor and the energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry were similar during the same aerobic bench stepping routine performed with and without arms (Δ∼2 kCal·min-1, p ≥ 0.05). Results confirm that arm movements during aerobic bench stepping elicit a disproportionate rise in heart rate relative to V[Combining Dot Above]O2. However, results do not support that these movements increase the prediction error in energy expenditure, as the Polar F6 heart rate monitor over predicted energy expenditure when arm movements were involved and when they were not involved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lloyd et al. (2014) studied this question. Bench step aerobics with arm movements vs. Bench step aerobics without arm movements was evaluated on Difference between energy expenditure estimated by the Polar F6 heart rate monitor and measured by indirect calorimetry (Δ∼2 kCal·min-1, p=≥ 0.05). The Polar F6 heart rate monitor overpredicted energy expenditure by ~2 kCal/min during bench stepping, with similar prediction errors whether arm movements were included or not (p ≥ 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: