Key result
In hemodialysis patients, switching from epoetin alfa to darbepoetin alfa maintained hemoglobin stability while significantly reducing the required ESA dose by approximately 65% (P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does switching from intravenous epoetin alfa to darbepoetin alfa maintain hemoglobin stability and reduce required ESA dose in hemodialysis patients?
Observational (n=125)
Yes
Does switching from intravenous epoetin alfa to darbepoetin alfa maintain hemoglobin stability and reduce required ESA dose in hemodialysis patients?
Switching hemodialysis patients from epoetin alfa to darbepoetin alfa maintains hemoglobin stability while significantly reducing the required ESA dose by approximately 65%.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports dose reduction with Hb stability on conversion in HD; leaves open randomized confirmation before practice change.
AIM: The objective of the study reported here was to describe dose equivalence and hemoglobin (Hb) stability in a cohort of unselected hemodialysis patients who were switched simultaneously from epoetin alfa to darbepoetin alfa. METHODS: This was a multicenter, observational, retrospective study in patients aged ≥18 years who switched from intravenous (IV) epoetin alfa to IV darbepoetin alfa in October 2007 (Month 0) and continued on hemodialysis for at least 24 months. The dose was adjusted to maintain Hb within 1.0 g/dL of baseline. RESULTS: We included 125 patients (59.7% male, mean [standard deviation (SD)] age 70.4 [13.4] years). No significant changes were observed in Hb levels (mean [SD] 11.9 [1.3] g/dL, 12.0 [1.5], 12.0 [1.5], and 12.0 [1.7] at Months -12, 0, 12 and 24, respectively, P=0.409). After conversion, the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) dose decreased significantly (P<0.0001), with an annual mean of 174.7 (88.7) international units (IU)/kg/week for epoetin versus 95.7 (43.4) (first year) and 91.4 (42.7) IU/kg/week (second year) for darbepoetin (65% and 64% reduction, respectively). The ESA resistance index decreased from 15.1 (8.5) IU/kg/week/g/dL with epoetin to 8.1 (3.9) (first year) and 7.9 (4.0) (second year) with darbepoetin (P<0.0001). The conversion rate was 354:1 in patients requiring high (>200 IU/kg/week) doses of epoetin and 291:1 in patients requiring low doses. CONCLUSION: In patients on hemodialysis receiving ESAs, conversion from epoetin alfa to darbepoetin alfa was associated with an approximate and persistent reduction of 65% of the required dose. To maintain Hb stability, a conversion rate of 300:1 seems to be appropriate for most patients receiving low doses of epoetin alfa (≤200 IU/kg/week), while 350:1 would be better for patients receiving higher doses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mackinnon et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Hemodialysis (n=125). Darbepoetin alfa vs. Epoetin alfa (pre-switch) was evaluated on Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) dose (IU/kg/week) (65% reduction, p=<0.0001). In hemodialysis patients, switching from epoetin alfa to darbepoetin alfa maintained hemoglobin stability while significantly reducing the required ESA dose by approximately 65% (P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: