Why the study?
Obesity, abdominal obesity, NAFLD, T2D, and CAD are linked in observational studies, but the underlying causal factors remain unexplored.
Does genetic predisposition to abdominal obesity independently increase the risk of NAFLD, T2D, and CAD?
Does genetic predisposition to abdominal obesity independently increase the risk of NAFLD, T2D, and CAD?
Abdominal obesity is a strong, independent, and causal contributor to NAFLD, T2D, and CAD, highlighting the importance of targeting abdominal obesity for cardiometabolic disease prevention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant targeting abdominal obesity in cardiometabolic prevention; extends multivariable MR evidence for independent causal effects on NAFLD, T2D, and CAD.
Background Observational studies have linked obesity and especially abdominal obesity to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). These traits are also associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and coronary artery disease (CAD) but the causal factor(s) underlying these associations remain unexplored. Methods We used a multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) study design to determine whether obesity (defined using body mass index [BMI]) and abdominal obesity (defined using waist circumference) were causally associated with NAFLD using publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics of the UK Biobank (n>450,000) and a GWAS meta-analysis of NAFLD (8434 cases and 770,180 control). A MVMR study design was also used to determine the respective causal contributions of waist circumference and NAFLD to T2D and CAD using additional GWAS summary statistics of the DIAGRAM (74,124 cases and 824,006 controls) and CARDIoGRAMplusC4D (122,733 cases and 424,528 controls) consortia. Results In univariable Mendelian randomization analyses, both BMI and waist circumference were associated with NAFLD. NAFLD was not associated with obesity or abdominal obesity. In MVMR analyses, waist circumference was associated with NAFLD when accounting for BMI (OR per 1-standard deviation increase = 2.56 95% CI: 1.39-4.69, p=2.4e-03) and BMI was not associated with NAFLD when accounting for waist circumference (0.81 95% CI: 0.5-1.31, p =3.9e-01). In MVMR analyses accounting for NAFLD, waist circumference remained strongly associated with both T2D (3.25 95% CI: 2.87-3.68, p=5.1e-77) and CAD (1.62 95% CI: 1.48-1.76, p=6.5e-28). Conclusions These results identified abdominal obesity as a strong, independent and causal contributor to NAFLD, T2D and CAD, suggesting that interventions targeting abdominal obesity rather than body weight per se should be prioritized for the prevention and management of cardiometabolic diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pelletier et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: