Key result
Baseline bifascicular block strongly predicted arrhythmic syncope during ILR follow-up (adjusted OR 5.5; 95% CI 2.3-13.2; p<0.001), primarily due to intermittent complete heart block.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the role of baseline 12-lead ECG in predicting the syncope mechanism during continuous monitoring using an implantable loop recorder.
Does an abnormal baseline 12-lead ECG predict arrhythmic syncope in patients investigated with an implantable loop recorder?
Cohort (n=300)
Does an abnormal baseline 12-lead ECG predict arrhythmic syncope in patients investigated with an implantable loop recorder?
Odds Ratio: 5.5 (95% CI 2.3–13.2)
p-value: p=<0.001
A baseline 12-lead ECG with bifascicular block strongly predicts arrhythmic syncope (mostly bradyarrhythmia) in patients with unexplained syncope, suggesting permanent pacing may be considered over ILR in this subgroup.
Baseline ECG may associate with ILR syncope mechanisms; leaves open whether it refines patient selection for implantation.
To evaluate the role of baseline 12‑lead ECG in predicting the syncope mechanism during continuous monitoring using an implantable loop recorder (ILR). Consecutive patients with syncope implanted with an ILR were enrolled. Baseline 12‑lead ECG were related to ECG diagnosis derived from ILR tracings recorded at the time of syncope recurrence. In total 300 patients with a mean age of 66 ± 16 years were included, 49% (146/300) received an ILR-guided diagnosis during follow-up. Patients with abnormal baseline ECG more frequently received an ILR-guided diagnosis compared to those with normal baseline ECG 59% vs. 44%, p = 0.018. For a diagnosis of arrhythmic syncope, the corresponding frequencies were 45% vs. 26%, p = 0.001. Patients with bifascicular block significantly more common received an ILR-guided diagnosis 76% (25/33) compared to those with normal baseline ECG 44% (90/205), p ≪ 0.001. In this subgroup, 96% (24/25) were diagnosed with arrhythmic syncope, 23 of which were due to bradyarrhythmia. Bifascicular block occurred almost exclusively among those ≥60 years (31/33). After logistic regression the adjusted OR for arrhythmic syncope was significant for bifascicular block 5.5 (95%CI 2.3–13.2), p ≪ 0.001. PPV for bifascicular block in predicting arrhythmic syncope was 73% and NPV 73%. A baseline 12‑lead ECG with bifascicular block was a strong predictor for syncope during follow-up, most often due to bradyarrhythmia caused by intermittent complete heart block. No other ECG findings were associated with the ILR outcome. We find it reasonable to consider permanent pacing instead of an ILR for patients with bifascicular block and unexplained syncope.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sandgren et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Syncope (n=300). Bifascicular block on baseline 12-lead ECG vs. Normal baseline ECG was evaluated on Arrhythmic syncope (OR 5.5, 95% CI 2.3-13.2, p=<0.001). Baseline bifascicular block strongly predicted arrhythmic syncope during ILR follow-up (adjusted OR 5.5; 95% CI 2.3-13.2; p<0.001), primarily due to intermittent complete heart block.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: