Computational modeling demonstrates that microstructural topology and cracking govern thermal conductivity decay in salt hydrates, highlighting key mechanics behind thermochemical storage degradation.
Inorganic salt hydrates are promising thermochemical energy storage (TCES) materials because of their low cost, high energy density, and moderate operating temperatures. However, hydration/dehydration cycling produces large volumetric changes that alter microstructure, generate internal stress, and drive progressive degradation, limiting long-term cyclic stability. Because heat-transfer performance depends on the evolving effective thermal conductivity, keff, predictive TCES models must account for how reaction-induceddeformation and damage modify conductive pathways during cycling.This work develops a representative volume element (RVE) based finite element framework to quantify the mechanics-driven evolution of keff in salt-hydrate TCES materials. The framework combines coupled thermo-chemo-mechanical simulations with a guarded-hot-plate-style numerical measurement of effective thermal conductivity. Void-based and particle-based RVEs are examined over a range of relative densities and boundary conditions to isolate the roles of porosity, pore morphology, inter-particle contact, and reaction-induced deformation. The results show that keff is not governed by relative density alone; microstructural topology and mechanical constraint play a central role in determining how conductive pathways evolve during reaction.To capture cyclic degradation, we further introduce a probabilistic chemo-mechanical damage framework that links reaction-induced cracking to pellet-level conductivity loss. Using experimentally informed cycle-dependent crack densities, the model predicts progressive reductions in keff over repeated hydration/dehydration cycles. Together, the RVE simulations and damage framework connect evolving microstructure, mechanical degradation, and heat-transfer performance in salt-hydrate TCES systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pyo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: