Systematic review reveals substantial evaluation inconsistencies and moderate evidence quality in transformer-based video object detection, highlighting reproducibility issues from non-public code.
This PRISMA 2020 systematic literature review analyzes efficient transformer-based video object detection (VOD). Across five databases through August 2025, 1343 records were identified, with 16 studies meeting the final inclusion criteria after full-text screening. Backward citation tracking added five additional eligible studies, yielding a small final evidence base of 21 studies (22 reports). This review’s major contributions are (i) a focused narrative synthesis at the intersection of efficient model design, temporal modeling, and video object detection transformers, due to methodological heterogeneity in the corpus; (ii) ROB-CVA, a proposed risk-of-bias framework for computer vision; and (iii) an evidence-based analysis of temporal modeling strategies and evaluation practices. Furthermore, we examine evaluation inconsistencies, including dataset fragmentation and risk-of-bias. Fifty-two percent of studies were rated as low risk-of-bias using the review-specific, non-validated ROB-CVA framework, driven mainly by non-public code and datasets; this distribution is sensitive to our risk-of-bias aggregation rule. The certainty of evidence is low to moderate. The review outlines open challenges and future directions. This review is registered on OSF (doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/Q9PJ4), supported by project AEOLUS (PHD IN INDUSTRY/1123/0145), and funded by the Republic of Cyprus through the Research and Innovation Foundation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keravnos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: