Computational simulation reveals how Soret diffusion and radiative cooling dictate buoyant flame kernel dynamics in ultra-lean hydrogen mixtures, highlighting competing effects on flame breakup.
Ultra-lean hydrogen flames under terrestrial gravity are governed by a coupled interaction among preferential diffusion, thermal diffusion, heat loss, and self-induced convection. This study numerically examines combustion in a quiescent 6 vol.% H2–air mixture using detailed chemistry and a low–Mach–number formulation. A complete set of calculations was considered, with Soret diffusion and optically thin radiative heat loss independently enabled and disabled. One-dimensional spherical calculations were used to isolate the initial post-ignition flame kernel growth, while two-dimensional planar and axisymmetric simulations described its subsequent buoyant rise, deformation, and breakup. Over the analyzed interval, the spherical flame-front radius followed an extended Rf2≈Kt regime rather than constant-speed expansion. Soret diffusion increased the effective growth coefficient K, whereas radiation reduced it. The axisymmetric calculations reproduced the experimentally measured leading-point trajectory substantially better than the planar formulation. Soret diffusion produced larger, faster-rising kernels and maintained a more nearly circular upper cap, whereas radiation had a weaker effect on trajectory but increased relative lateral flattening. In all cases, a toroidal vortex stretched the flame segment and caused local extinction and fragmentation. Soret diffusion delayed breakup, while radiation advanced it; their combined effect on breakup time was nearly compensating. The results show that Soret transport and radiation primarily alter kernel growth and resistance to vortex-induced extinction, while the qualitative breakup pathway remains hydrodynamically controlled.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yakovenko et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: