Spatial modeling reveals pathway regulation of ecosystem water-use efficiency across semiarid vegetation types, highlighting divergent seasonal controls between herbaceous and woody biomes.
Study region The Loess Plateau, China, encompassing grassland, cropland, shrubland and forest ecosystems. Study focus Ecosystem water-use efficiency (eWUE) reflects carbon–water coupling, yet how environmental effects are transmitted through the carbon (GPP) and water (ET) fluxes remains poorly resolved in water-limited regions. We addressed this across the Loess Plateau (2001–2019) at sub-kilometer resolution, combining a spatial random forest, partial-derivative decomposition and conditional probability ratio (CPR) analysis to resolve vegetation-specific controls, their GPP- and ET-mediated pathways and extreme responses. New hydrological insights for the region eWUE was highest in autumn (1.39 gC·m⁻²·mm⁻¹) and lowest and largely stable in spring (1.08 gC·m⁻²·mm⁻¹; 77.34% of pixels with non-significant trend). eWUE extremes were primarily associated with VPD and DSR in spring and summer but shrublands in summer (CPR = 2.14–3.86). Pathway attribution was driver-specific rather than a uniform seasonal switch. Environmental effects were mostly transmitted through ET ( f ET = 0.55–0.94) in spring. In summer, VPD shifted to GPP-mediation in all vegetation types ( f GPP = 0.56–0.85), whereas AW remained ET-mediated ( f ET = 0.52–0.68). DSR and PRE diverged by vegetation type, GPP-mediated in herbaceous but ET-mediated in woody ecosystems. AW switched to GPP-mediation only in autumn ( f GPP = 0.55–0.90). Our findings provide a mechanistic basis for predicting eWUE responses to climate variability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: