Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational evaluation demonstrates adaptive privacy budgeting balances electroencephalography protection and classification accuracy, highlighting scalable utility in decentralized healthcare.
Protecting sensitive biomedical data is a critical security challenge in decentralized healthcare environments without a trusted authority. Electroencephalography (EEG) signals constitute highly sensitive biometric data used for neurological disorder diagnosis, making privacy-preserving analysis essential. Local differential privacy (LDP) addresses this challenge by perturbing data at the source; however, selecting an appropriate privacy budget ε remains nontrivial, as it directly governs the privacy–utility trade-off. This work proposes a sensitivity-aware privacy budget selection framework for EEG-based analysis under LDP, leveraging multi-criteria decision making to jointly consider privacy level, data accuracy, computational cost, and data sensitivity. Unlike existing approaches that rely on a single global privacy budget, the proposed framework performs participant-specific privacy budget selection, accounting for differences in data sensitivity across participating data sources. Privacy budgets are adaptively selected using TOPSIS and Fuzzy TOPSIS, enabling sensitivity-aware calibration without modifying the underlying LDP mechanism. Experiments conducted on the University of Bonn EEG dataset employ time-domain, frequency-domain, nonlinear, and wavelet features, with eight machine learning classifiers evaluated on privacy-preserving data against a noise-free baseline. The results show that Fuzzy TOPSIS consistently selects smaller privacy budgets, achieving stronger privacy guarantees while maintaining a favorable balance between privacy protection and classification performance. Performance remains stable across classifiers, and the additional computational overhead is modest. Overall, the findings demonstrate that sensitivity-aware privacy budget selection enables effective privacy–utility trade-offs for EEG analysis, offering a scalable and ethically grounded solution for privacy-preserving biomedical signal processing in decentralized healthcare systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bay et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: