Conceptual framework demonstrates how proactive AI can diagnose barriers and build durable human capabilities across unequal life conditions, suggesting pathways beyond passive assistance.
Status. K0 conceptual and measurement architecture with an empirical research agenda; v1.1 is the glosa-checked edition of the 6 September 2026 v1.0 (citation lineage repaired to deposited DOIs, versions and public git anchors; priority-adjacent wording replaced by a contribution boundary; tier tags added to every boxed equation; no content change). Part of the series When AI Expands Human Potential (index DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22308201). Extends the Dialogue Conversion Protocol (10.5281/zenodo.22481928) with a proactive capability layer and sits under the macro boundary of After Labour (10.5281/zenodo.22481924) and The Human Conversion Imperative (10.5281/zenodo.22481926). Central claim. When durable human development is an agreed goal, AI need not remain purely reactive: starting from a human-owned live problem it may diagnose whether an observed difficulty is a knowledge or skill gap or a structural barrier (language, tool, resource, network, credential, permission, opportunity), generate non-equivalent capability and opportunity routes, ask for human endorsement, scaffold adaptively, withdraw decisive assistance, test unaided Human Return, and connect retained capability to world feedback and real opportunity. Non-collapse laws: Observed Difficulty ≠ Skill Deficit; Proactive Suggestion ≠ Human Goal Ownership; Credential ≠ Capability; Market Legibility ≠ Human Worth. A worked Southern-Thailand three-child scenario, child and adult governance bundles, six outcome families, a five-study programme, six rival models and removal conditions are stated. No exact human-domain quotient or calibrated universal scale is claimed. An AI assistant assisted under the author's direction; no AI system is an author or contributor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yaoharee Lahtee (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: