Computational study demonstrates improved score transcription and instrument recognition across standard benchmarks, highlighting the value of music-specific cross-module coupling.
Automatic understanding of multi-instrument music requires the joint interpretation of score images, harmonic relations, and audio-side instrument identities, yet these tasks are commonly optimized in isolation. This study proposes a modular, interface-coupled framework for score transcription, harmony-aware symbolic reconstruction, and multi-instrument recognition. The framework consists of a multi-scale residual neural network (MSR-NN), a temporal harmonic graph convolutional network (THGCN), and a dual-branch CNN-DCNN. MSR-NN preserves staff-position and note-contour information through bottom-up residual extraction and top-down shallow–deep feature fusion. THGCN constructs graph edges according to integer harmonic ratios in the log-frequency domain and uses a GRU to model temporal continuity. CNN-DCNN combines standard and dilated convolutions to capture local timbral cues and broader spectro-temporal context without reducing Mel-spectrogram resolution. The three outputs are coupled through a constrained symbolic decoder rather than a fully joint end-to-end network. Under the PrIMuS and GrandStaff protocols, MSR-NN reduces the symbol error rate to 3.82%, representing an improvement of 0.40–4.09 percentage points over the selected baselines. Component ablation increases SER from 3.82% to 4.37% after removing multi-scale fusion and to 4.68% after removing residual learning. Replacing THGCN with temporal-only modeling increases F0-RMSE from 3.52 to 4.07, while replacing CNN-DCNN with a standard CNN reduces macro-F1 from 0.742 to 0.712. Symbolic refinement improves sequence consistency from 88.3% to 94.3%. On IRMAS, CNN-DCNN obtains an accuracy of 0.929, a macro-F1 of 0.742, and a macro-AUC of 0.934. External and perturbation tests obtain an AUC of 0.846 on the common-label OpenMIC-2018 transfer setting and 0.911 under 10-dB additive noise. Five-seed paired tests remain significant after Holm correction (adjusted p < 0.05). These results demonstrate that the contribution lies in music-specific cross-module coupling and constrained symbolic reconstruction rather than in introducing residual, graph, recurrent, or dilated convolution as isolated operators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: