Mixed-methods study demonstrates alignment between public priorities and historic library legislation in England, indicating a need for policy clarification over full replacement.
This paper evaluates the adequacy of the Public Libraries and Museums Act (1964) for contemporary public library services in England. Drawing on a multi-phase mixed methods study, it compares public (user and non-user) perspectives identified in a Q study in Southeast England with stakeholder perspectives and the legislative framework. Findings show strong alignment between public understandings and the Act’s core functions, but significant divergence in expanded roles promoted by stakeholders. The paper argues that the Act is not obsolete but requires a legislative shift to clarify purpose, align expectations, and foreground public needs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McKenna-Aspell et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: