Validation study demonstrates reliable iodine quantification and background cancellation with a 3D-printed breast phantom across multiple systems, indicating strong potential for mammography...
An anthropomorphic patient-derived 3D-printed breast phantom (4.8 cm compressed thickness, 12.2% volumetric breast density) was evaluated for image-quality assessment in contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). It comprises four 1.2 cm plates printed via fused filament fabrication (PLA/ABS). Five replicates of one of the plates (target) containing a glandular-tissue surrogate and four cavities for iodinated disks with same iodine area density per plate (0.2–0.5–0.75–1.0–1.5 mg/cm2) were fabricated. As a reference, a homogeneous PET-G phantom was printed. CEM images (low-energy (LE), high-energy (HE), and DES) were acquired in three different systems. Iodine signal linearity (mean pixel value, signal difference, signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SdNR)) and background cancellation (residual signals, texture cancellation coefficient (TCC), parameter β from noise power spectrum (1D-NPS)) were estimated. Evaluation across the three systems demonstrated the phantom provides appropriate measurements of iodine signal linearity (R2 > 0.986, based on mean values across the four inserts) and background cancellation (TCC:0.04–0.11). Fitting 1D-NPS = αf−β within 0.25–1.0 mm−1 yielded β values ≈ 3.1–4.0, compatible with the literature, for patient LE and HE images, whereas DES reduced β to ≈1.1. In the homogeneous phantom, β remained invariant between LE and DES images (β ≈ 0.6). The local glandular ratio at each position of the iodinated disks enabled evaluating the impact of background on iodine signal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belarra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: