Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bus stops are interfaces between walking, public transport, streets, and neighborhood life. This study defines a humanized bus stop as one whose provisions enable diverse users to approach, wait, obtain information, and board with independence, dignity, safety, climatic protection, and connection to place. A three-stage applied design was used. First, 39 verifiable records were reviewed. Second, their characteristics were consolidated into a 35-item framework covering nine domains. Third, the researcher applied the framework to 15 air-conditioned shelters of the same design model in Riyadh through daytime and evening visits. Of 525 item–stop observations, 420 were assessable. The unweighted descriptive audit index was 71.5%, with stop-level scores ranging from 66.1% to 75.0%. Cooling, shade, seating, route identity, real-time information, and system integration were strengths. Dedicated wheelchair space and connectivity and charging were absent, while multisensory information, older-adult support, local wayfinding, emergency support, vegetation, and place identity remained incomplete. Sixteen recommendations were prioritized as essential, desirable, or context dependent. The framework provides a transparent basis for auditing bus stop provisions and guiding improvement, but requires validation with users, experts, operators, older adults, and people with disabilities before it can represent passenger experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nahar Bahij Abdelfattah (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: