Comparative in vitro study reveals superior tenogenic differentiation in canine tendon-derived stem cells versus fat-derived cells, highlighting their value for veterinary tendon repair.
Background Tendon-derived stem cells (TDSCs) possess inherent lineage specificity for tendon regeneration. However, their characteristics in dogs remain poorly defined. Establishing a canine tendon-derived stem cell (cTDSC) population and verifying its tenogenic properties is essential for developing species-appropriate regenerative strategies. Results cTDSCs were isolated from adult canine tendons collected after completion of an unrelated IACUC-approved experiment. The cells expanded stably until passage eight while maintaining a fibroblast-like morphology. They demonstrated adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic differentiation and expressed mesenchymal markers including SRY-box transcription factor 2 (SOX2), ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73), and Thy-1 cell surface antigen (CD90), together with tendon-associated genes such as scleraxis ( SCX ), mohawk homeobox ( MKX ), tenascin-C ( TNC ), and tenomodulin ( TNMD ) at baseline. During tenogenic induction, cTDSCs exhibited early upregulation of SCX and MKX , followed by progressive increases in TNC , TNMD , and collagen type I ( COL1A1 ), accompanied by a decline in collagen type III ( COL3A1 ). These temporal patterns mirror the established phases of tendon maturation. Compared with canine adipose-derived stem cells (cADSCs), cTDSCs showed significantly higher expression of tendon-associated genes and proteins during induction, indicating a more pronounced tenogenic differentiation response. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that cTDSCs retain the intrinsic tendon-specific priming derived from their native microenvironment, underscoring their value as a biologically relevant progenitor cell source. Conclusions This study established cTDSCs as a tendon-specific mesenchymal stem cell population with superior tenogenic responsiveness to cADSCs. These findings provide foundational, species-specific data for future translational research on canine tendon repair and regenerative therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
김수환 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: