Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates enhanced crack detection accuracy in visible-light photovoltaic panels, indicating improved automated inspection for solar energy infrastructure.
Visible-light photovoltaic (PV) inspection is affected by periodic grid-line backgrounds, low-contrast cracks, irregular crack topology, and the extreme aspect ratios of slender defects. To address these difficulties, a frequency-domain hybrid deformation and geometry-regression YOLO network, termed FHDG-YOLO, is proposed in this study. The method introduces frequency-domain dynamic decoupled convolution to attenuate periodic background responses, incorporates a high-resolution P2 detection head and efficient multi-scale attention to retain and recalibrate shallow spatial details, embeds DCNv2 to adapt convolutional sampling to irregular defect boundaries, and replaces the original regression loss with MicroShape-IoU for geometry-sensitive localization. Experiments are conducted on a reorganized two-class visible-light PV dataset containing 6493 images, comprising 6262 screened public images and 231 field images collected by the authors. On the 1300-image validation split, FHDG-YOLO obtains a Precision of 0.954, Recall of 0.943, mAP@0.5 of 0.971, and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 0.861. Compared with YOLOv8n, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 increase by 3.6 and 6.9 percentage points, respectively. On the held-out 649-image test split, the corresponding mAP values are 0.970 and 0.860, compared with 0.931 and 0.785 for YOLOv8n. Under the original four-class Panel Solar validation protocol, FHDG-YOLO obtains mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 values of 0.954 and 0.843, compared with 0.929 and 0.780 for YOLOv8n.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: