Petrological analysis uncovers multiphase liquid immiscibility during crystallization in a Precambrian rare-metal granite dike, highlighting mechanisms governing rare-element enrichment.
This work is devoted to the investigation of rare-metal granites associated with anorthosite–rapakivi granite rock complexes. This article evaluates the physicochemical conditions that governed the formation of a rare-metal granite dike. It also explores assumptions regarding the geological characteristics of the magmatic chamber, describes evidence for liquid immiscibility, and addresses the post-entrapment evolution of hydrosilicate liquids. In addition, new mineralogical data are presented. The methods employed include optical and electron microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, secondary ion mass spectrometry, laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA–ICP–MS), melt inclusion homogenisation experiments, and fluid inclusion study. The investigated granitic dike formed under low pressure (60–110 MPa) and temperatures of about 580–600 °C, from a specific volatile-saturated magma rich in H2O (up to 16.76 wt% in quenched hydrosilicate liquid products) and in F (up to 4.16 wt%) and Li (up to 3804 ppm), as indicated by homogenised melt inclusions. At the time of emplacement, a silicate melt, a probable Ca-fluoride melt, an Mg-Fe Al-Si-rich hydrosilicate liquid (either mutually soluble with or mixed with the inferred Ca-fluoride melt), and an essentially aqueous fluid coexisted. Depolymerisation of the silicate melt and the presence of complex ions probably promoted the dissolution and transport of high field strength elements (HFSE) and large ion lithophile elements (LILE) elements by the Mg-Fe Al-Si-rich hydrosilicate liquid. During the final stage of evolution of the granitic magmatic system, Mg behaved incompatibly because of its negligible partitioning into mica; rather than accumulating in the silicate melt, it entered the hydrosilicate liquid as a major component. The residual silicate melt consequently attained even lower Zr/Hf, Nb/Ta, and Y/Ho ratios than the studied rock.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Конышев et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: