Design and Experimental Validation of a DT-FPID-Based Local Canopy CO2 Enrichment Control System in a Chinese Solar Greenhouse

Carbon dioxide (CO2) enrichment is an important means of increasing crop productivity in protected cultivation. However, local canopy CO2 concentration in Chinese solar greenhouses is jointly affected by gas release, pipeline transport, and ventilation disturbances, making fixed-parameter proportional–integral–derivative (PID) control unable to simultaneously achieve rapid tracking, low overshoot, and fast disturbance recovery. This study developed a CO2 enrichment system comprising controlled thermal decomposition of ammonium bicarbonate, condensation and water scrubbing, near-canopy delivery, and programmable logic controller (PLC)-based closed-loop control, and proposed a dynamic-target fuzzy PID (DT-FPID) strategy. Step-response tests were used to establish a first-order-plus-dead-time model linking heater duty cycle to local canopy CO2 concentration, followed by fixed-target tracking, rule-based dynamic-target execution, and short-term ventilation-disturbance recovery tests in a local validation zone of a Chinese solar greenhouse. Relative to fixed-parameter PID, DT-FPID showed approximately 68–79% lower maximum overshoot and approximately 35–70% shorter ±20 ppm precision settling time (T20) in simulation. At 600 ppm, the ±5% settling time was approximately 71% shorter, whereas at 800 and 1000 ppm it was broadly comparable to PID. In the greenhouse experiments, each controller–target combination included three independent runs. Based on descriptive comparisons of group means, DT-FPID showed approximately 47–49% lower mean maximum overshoot, approximately 36–40% shorter mean settling time, and approximately 77–80% shorter mean ventilation-disturbance recovery time; its mean maximum overshoot and settling time were also lower than those of conventional fuzzy PID. All three dynamic-target field runs completed the prescribed switches among the 600, 800, and 1000 ppm target levels. These results support control performance only under the short-term local validation conditions of this study; they are not used to determine physiologically or economically optimal CO2 concentrations or to extrapolate whole-greenhouse uniformity or long-term production effects.