Cross-sectional study reveals high rates of physical victimization and self-harm ideation among secondary school adolescents, highlighting the need for trauma-informed school interventions.
Background: Bullying is a pervasive global issue that undermines student safety. In Nigeria’s Niger Delta, data on the specific socio-ecological patterns and psychological consequences of peer and institutional victimization are lacking. This study analyzed the multifactorial patterns, effects, and coping mechanisms of bullying among secondary school students in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 404 adolescents attending secondary school in Yenagoa, Bayelsa state. Data were collected using a structured, self-administered questionnaire and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 25.0. The results were presented in tables and chats. Results: Bullying patterns were primarily physical (77.7%) and verbal (76.2%), occurring most frequently within the classroom (69.2%). Victims were targeted based on perceived social vulnerabilities, including being viewed as "weird" (28.8%), "weak" (27.0%), or from "poor families" (14.2%). The effects were profound: 34.8% of students engaged in school avoidance and 25.9% reported self-harm ideation. 62.2% of victims coped passively by attempting to ignore or avoid the situation; 20.6% coped actively by making fun of the situation, 20.3% fought back, 14.5% sought help from a teacher, and 9.9% sought help from family, while 6.2% said they did not cope. Conclusion: Bullying among study participants is a systemic crisis driven by social stratification and institutionalized aggression. The high rate of self-harm ideation and school avoidance necessitates urgent trauma-informed interventions and strict anti-bullying policies by the State Ministry of Education to protect vulnerable students
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oguche et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: