Cross-sectional study finds child clinical complexity increases severe caregiver burden in pediatric epilepsy, highlighting the need for targeted family support.
Caregivers of children with epilepsy often experience impaired well-being and high burden, but it is unclear how multidimensional clinical complexity and access to resources shape these outcomes. We conducted a single-center, mixed-channel, electronic cross-sectional questionnaire survey of primary caregivers of children with epilepsy ( N = 551). Participants were recruited through center-coordinated outpatient, inpatient, online, and caregiver/patient support-network channels. Severe caregiver burden (BSFC-s ≥ 15) was specified as the primary inferential outcome, and low well-being (WHO-5 < 50) was examined as an additional clinically relevant caregiver outcome. We constructed a Clinical Complexity Index (CCI; 0–6) and a Resource Access/Use Score (RAS; 0–4). Multivariable logistic regression examined the association between CCI and severe caregiver burden, while resource-related interaction and cross-sectional path analyses were prespecified as exploratory secondary analyses. Low well-being (WHO-5 < 50) and severe caregiver burden (BSFC-s ≥ 15) were common (75.5% and 66.6%, respectively). In the fully adjusted main-effects model (Model 3), each 1-point increase in CCI was associated with higher odds of severe caregiver burden (aOR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.44–1.94). RAS was not independently associated with severe burden in Model 3. The exploratory CCI × RAS interaction was statistically supported (aOR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.77–0.99), suggesting that the complexity–burden association varied across RAS levels. The central finding was that higher caregiver-relevant clinical complexity was consistently associated with severe caregiver burden. Resource-related interaction and psychosocial path findings provide exploratory context and require longitudinal validation before being used to infer mechanisms, resource effects, or care pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: