Meta-scientific review reveals an estimated fifty percent replication rate across sociological studies, highlighting an urgent need for structural methodological reform.
By emphasizing the integration of theory and empirics, open science, and the separation of research from activism, Aksoy et al. (2026) present a scientific vision for sociology. I argue that such a vision also requires taking the scientific principles of replicability, reproducibility, and robustness seriously. Yet little is said about how sociology currently performs on these three principles. Based on recent large-scale audits, we can estimate that there is only a fifty-fifty chance that a sociological study is replicable, reproducible, or robust. This is lower than neighboring disciplines such as psychology, political science, and economics. I therefore argue that improving on these aspects should be a central priority for sociology in the upcoming years, and offer some recommendations to this end.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kasper Otten (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: