Computational modeling study reveals that target geometry alters dynamic impact rankings across aerospace materials during bird strikes, indicating no single material universally outperforms.
Bird strikes cause aircraft damage, create serious risks to human safety and can contribute to catastrophic incidents, while continuing to impose substantial economic costs on airlines. The impact combines high kinetic energy with discontinuous, strongly nonlinear contact over a short duration, producing large structural deformations; appropriate nonlinear simulation techniques are therefore required to capture this complex interaction. For this purpose, the present study applies established Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH)–finite element modelling ingredients to a controlled matrix of aerospace material systems and target geometries. The approach is first benchmarked against a published aluminium flat-plate bird-impact test using a raster-digitised force-history comparison, after which monolithic metallic and composite structures and source-described honeycomb-sandwich alternatives are assessed in flat-panel and curved leading-edge configurations. The results show that contact-force and local-displacement rankings depend strongly on target geometry and response metric, with the curved leading edge changing the ordering observed for the flat panel. More compliant systems generally permit greater local displacement, whereas stiffer systems restrict displacement but can sustain higher short-duration force peaks; consequently, no universal material ranking follows from a single response measure, and the results are most suitable for preliminary design screening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lalehparvar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: