Empirical analysis reveals baseline cost advantages but higher rigidity in organic versus conventional farms, highlighting the economic resilience of agroecological practices.
This study empirically examines the cost behavior in organic versus conventional farming to assess economic resilience. Using Spanish FADN data (2015–2021), results show organic farms exhibit higher cost elasticity during output increases and lower elasticity during decreases. This rigidity reflects a commitment to natural capital and agroecological dependencies. However, organic farms benefit from an “ecological dividend”—a baseline cost advantage derived from internal synergies and reduced reliance on external inputs—making them more competitive during typical fluctuations. This advantage persists until output variation thresholds of 40%–50% (increases) and 22%–29% (decreases) are reached, beyond which conventional systems adjust more flexibly. These findings support the economic viability of agroecology and suggest the need for institutional safeguards against extreme shocks to protect sustainable production models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Argilés-Bosch et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: