Algorithm evaluation demonstrates improved registration recall in underwater multibeam echosounder point clouds, highlighting enhanced structural alignment under low-overlap conditions.
Underwater point cloud registration using Multibeam Echosounder (MBES) data is fundamental to marine exploration and seafloor mapping. However, MBES point clouds present unique challenges compared to terrestrial Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR): high noise levels, low overlap rates, and strongly anisotropic distributions caused by the strip-like sonar scanning pattern. These characteristics degrade existing registration algorithms, which predominantly assume locally isotropic point distributions. To address these challenges, this paper proposes Anisotropic Kernel Point Convolution (A-KPConv), a novel operator tailored to the strip-like structure of MBES point clouds. A-KPConv uses Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to estimate local geometric principal directions and constructs an affine transformation that adapts the convolution kernel shape and orientation to align with the local geometry, thereby shifting feature extraction from isotropic aggregation to structure-aware feature learning along the principal structural directions. Building upon this operator, we integrate A-KPConv into Predator—a framework for low-overlap registration—to develop A-Predator, in which the standard isotropic KPConv in the first three encoder layers is replaced with A-KPConv so that structure-aware feature learning is performed where geometric information is most salient. Extensive experiments on the public Dotson-east dataset and a self-collected LiQuan Lake (LQL) MBES dataset demonstrate that A-Predator achieves the highest registration recall among the evaluated methods. On Dotson-east, recall improves from 31.63% to 59.55% under 10% overlap, with consistently low translation and rotation errors. Ablation studies support the effectiveness of A-KPConv relative to the evaluated anisotropic operators, and cross-dataset experiments suggest more effective transfer than the evaluated baselines from Dotson-east to the rescaled LQL-MBES data without fine-tuning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: