Machine learning evaluation demonstrates 98.5% intrusion detection accuracy in imbalanced network traffic, highlighting effective false-alarm reduction despite reduced attack recall.
The increasing sophistication of cyber threats and severe class imbalance in network traffic continue to challenge traditional intrusion detection systems. This study proposes a hybrid framework that integrates SMOTE and CTGAN for minority-class augmentation, a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) network for supervised traffic classification, and a benign-trained Variational Autoencoder (VAE) for validating low-confidence predictions. The framework was evaluated on the CSE-CIC-IDS2018 dataset. On a final holdout test partition of 2,759,227 network flows, it achieved a binary accuracy of 98.51%, an F1-score of 92.59%, and a ROC-AUC of 0.9935. In the 15-class evaluation, it achieved 98.50% accuracy and a weighted F1-score of 98.42%, while stratified 10-fold cross-validation yielded a mean accuracy of 98.79%. The VAE was activated for 519,389 low-confidence flows, representing 18.82% of the complete holdout test partition, and primarily reduced false-positive predictions, although this improvement was accompanied by a measurable reduction in attack recall. SHAP analysis was applied to the supervised Bi-LSTM component to provide feature-level interpretability. The framework also achieved a mean inference latency of 0.5195 ms per network flow. These findings demonstrate strong aggregate detection performance, stable generalisation, effective false-alarm reduction, and low inference latency, while highlighting continuing challenges in rare-class and open-set detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maake et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: