Key result
Low pH (3.3) dialysis of plasma structurally alters inactive renin, facilitating its activation by renal kallikrein, whereas untreated plasma shows no activation.
Inactive renin requires a structural alteration by low pH prior to activation by renal kallikrein, suggesting kallikrein may not be the sole in vivo activator.
Does not alter clinical practice; leaves open whether low-pH activation of inactive renin occurs in vivo.
Renal kallikrein may be the physiologic protease which activates renin. In vitro activation of plasma inactive renin by renal kallikrein, however, requires prior dialysis of plasma to pH 3.3, which is thought to destroy endogenous plasma kallikrein inhibitors. We present evidence that low pH directly alters renin to facilitate its activation by renal kallikrein. Untreated normal plasma was combined with pH 3.3 dialyzed and neutralized plasma and incubated with semipurified human renal kallikrein 2.3 X 10(-2) to 4.6 IU/ml, pH 7.5, 25 degrees C for 1h. All concentrations activated renin in acid-treated plasma; whereas, in untreated plasma 4.6 IU/ml renal kallikrein was ineffective. In combinations of untreated and acid-treated plasma, the percent renin activated by renal kallikrein was equal to the percent acid-dialyzed plasma present. When acid-treated plasma was combined with buffer, activation was complete and quantitatively the same as in the untreated and acid-treated plasma combinations. The data suggest inactive renin itself is altered structurally by pH 3.3; this change in the renin molecule is necessary for kallikrein activation. Renal kallikrein may not be the sole in vivo activator of renin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsueh et al. (1980) studied this question. Low pH (3.3) dialysis vs. Untreated normal plasma was evaluated on Renin activation by renal kallikrein. Low pH (3.3) dialysis of plasma structurally alters inactive renin, facilitating its activation by renal kallikrein, whereas untreated plasma shows no activation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: