Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conceptual analysis demonstrates the necessity of epistemic reflexivity in AI-assisted science, highlighting the need to safeguard intellectual diversity against scientific monoculture.
Using generative AI in science necessitates that institutions and researchers practice epistemic reflexivity to protect intellectual diversity and resist the threat of scientific monoculture. We argue that researchers and institutions can position generative AI both as a tool for epistemic reflexivity and as an object that must be examined reflexively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kendeou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: