Computational modeling study demonstrates automated pothole severity classification and spatial prioritization across road networks, highlighting streamlined infrastructure maintenance planning.
Potholes are a major form of road deterioration that can affect road safety, vehicle performance, traffic movement, and transportation infrastructure. Traditional road inspection mainly depends on manual surveys and complaint-based reporting, which can be time-consuming, costly, and difficult to apply across large road networks. This paper proposes an integrated Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Geographic Information System (GIS)-based framework for automated pothole detection, severity assessment, repair-priority ranking, and approximate cost prediction. The framework uses YOLO-based computer vision to detect potholes from road images and extract visual characteristics including bounding-box width, height, area, aspect ratio, and relative image coverage. These features are intended for machine-learning models such as Random Forest and XGBoost to classify potholes into Low, Medium, and High severity categories. GIS-based analysis then incorporates contextual information such as road class, traffic conditions, proximity to critical services, and pothole distribution. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) combines severity and spatial risk factors to generate repair-priority rankings. Regression models are proposed for approximate repair-cost prediction using defect characteristics, repair category, and road type. The current cleaned dataset contains 1,740 pothole records with image and bounding-box information. Because actual repair-cost labels are not present in the current dataset, cost prediction is defined as a subsequent stage requiring supplementary maintenance-cost records. The main contribution is a unified decision-support framework connecting visual detection, severity assessment, geographic context, repair prioritization, and cost planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghogare et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: