Risk analysis framework uncovers critical operational vulnerabilities in satellite ground segments, indicating an urgent need for layered defense-in-depth protections.
Satellite systems are integral to telecommunications, navigation, Earth observation, defense, and other critical infrastructures. A satellite system comprises space, ground, and communication-link segments, with the ground segment providing command, control, telemetry, and data-processing functions. This paper examines cybersecurity risks within satellite ground-segment infrastructure through structured threat profiling and risk analysis. Despite growing attention to satellite security, existing literature often addresses space and ground segments together, making it difficult to isolate ground-specific threats, actors, and consequences. To address this gap, this study develops a threat-profiling framework based on six dimensions: threat actors, attack vectors, targeted assets, vulnerabilities, attack objectives, and potential impact. It maps major ground-segment assets including Mission Operations Centers, ground stations, TT&C systems, and cloud platforms, and analyzes how conventional cyberattacks can propagate into mission-critical environments. Using a qualitative risk model of Risk = Likelihood × Impact, the paper prioritizes threats and classifies them into Low, Moderate, High, and Critical levels. Credential compromise, malware/ransomware, and command/data manipulation are identified as critical risks due to high likelihood and potential to disrupt satellite operations. The study concludes that protecting ground-segment infrastructure requires a layered, defense-in-depth approach aligned with NIST cybersecurity principles, encompassing identity management, network segmentation, supply-chain controls, and incident response. The findings provide a threat-oriented foundation for developing more resilient cybersecurity measures for satellite ground operations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akagwu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: