Survey study reveals that fairness perception offsets negative psychological biases in consumer-to-consumer traders, highlighting the importance of transparent trading platforms.
Purpose This study examines the interactions within trading decisions, concentrating on psychological constructs such as empathy and endowment perception. It integrates fairness perception and emotional attachment as potential mediators and decision uncertainty, as well as risk attitude as moderators, offering insights on behavioral patterns in the consumer-to-consumer market. Design/methodology/approach The research employs a quantitative method and a structured questionnaire was used as an instrument, collecting a total of 415 responses from customers actively involved in trading in Karnataka, India. The data analysis included structural equation modeling (SEM), measuring the direct, indirect, as well as total effects of the psychological constructs on trading decisions. Findings The findings show that while empathy has a negative direct effect on trading decision outcomes, it has a positive indirect effect through the effect of fairness perception. Like empathy, endowment perception also indicated mixed outcomes during the research study. Further, risk attitude and decision uncertainty had a significant moderation effect on these relationships. Overall, fairness perception is reflected as a critical mediator, re-framing the psychological barriers to trading decisions. Practical implications Policymakers and trading platforms can incorporate strategies to reduce the negative consequences of emotional and psychological biases via interventions, including improved transparency, as well as fair trading practices. Originality/value This study boosts the literature on behavioral finance by merging various theories, like prospect theory, psychological ownership theory and equity theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheikh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: