Rational Risk or Cultural Resistance: Co-Produced Findings on Structural Barriers to Drug and Alcohol Recovery Among South Asian Muslim Communities in England

Background: South Asian Muslim (SAM) communities remain significantly underserved by mainstream drug and alcohol (D&A) recovery services in England. Cultural and religious misalignment in service design creates structural barriers to engagement. Family members from SAM communities who support individuals with substance use disorders have identified structural, cultural, and religious barriers that hinder engagement with mainstream treatment services. This study builds on this body of evidence by working with service providers, commissioners and community stakeholders through participatory co-production to examine how these barriers can be addressed. Methods: Three participatory co-production workshops were held over a 12-week period. Data were also generated from a field visit to a culturally adapted recovery service and a content analysis of an Islamically adapted 12-step recovery workbook. Participants included commissioners, service providers, community ambassadors and service users (total n = 42 across three workshops; some participants attended more than one workshop). Results: Four interconnected themes that shaped recovery engagement were identified: (1) stigma and izzat operating as a collective structural risk management system; (2) confidentiality functioning as a precondition for engagement rather than a by-product of it; (3) service design, space and visibility as determinants of access; and (4) co-construction of religiously coherent recovery pathways. Low engagement among participants reflected rational risk management, in response to real social consequences, rather than cultural resistance. Conclusions: Findings suggest that inclusive recovery systems may benefit from the adaptation of mainstream services rather than the creation of parallel provision. Six evidence-based design principles are proposed for commissioners and service providers. Findings contribute to the evidence base for equitable health, culturally responsive D&A intervention design and have relevance beyond SAM communities to other marginalised faith communities across England.