Barrier-based safety systems are fundamental to preventing accidents in high-hazard industrial operations. However, traditional Hazard Identification (HAZID) and risk screening frameworks aggregate safety safeguards at a macro-hazard level, creating a systemic blind spot that masks threat-specific vulnerabilities and single points of failure. To address this gap, this study develops ‘Maximum-Vulnerability Diagrams’ (MVD), a network-based modeling approach that maps and quantifies threat–barrier pathways using matrix algebra and conditional probability. Validated across empirical cases of working-at-height (H-06.01) and heavy rotary equipment (H-08.01) operations in the oil extraction industry, the MVD successfully isolates high-criticality, zero-redundancy pathways. We mathematically establish that multiplexed defenses require a target individual efficiency of η ≥ 95% to reliably suppress system failure probability below a strict 5% operational threshold. The findings demonstrate that aggregate safeguard volume is a deceptive safety metric, and that systemic resilience depends entirely on network architecture. This framework transitions risk governance from passive compliance checking to predictive, threat-driven barrier management, offering an actionable methodology to optimize safety resources before accidents occur.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moneo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: