Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background We evaluated 1-year engagement in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) care and associated factors among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in a large cohort of oral PrEP users in the Paris region, France. Methods We included in this analysis cisgender GBMSM enrolled in the ANRS PREVENIR cohort study from 3 May 2017 to 28 February 2019. We categorized 1-year PrEP engagement into 4 categories: high (consistent visits, attendance, and prescription refills at months 3, 6, 9, and 12), low (missed visits or no prescription refills), disengagement (PrEP discontinuation), and lost to follow-up. We used a logistic regression model to identify sociodemographic and behavioral factors associated with high engagement in PrEP care. Results Of 3211 participants, 2685 GBMSM were included in the analysis. At enrollment, participants had a median age of 36 years, with 88% born in Europe and 52.4% already undergoing PrEP. At month 12, 1612 (60.0%) participants met the high engagement definition, 438 (16.3%) exhibited low engagement, 459 (17.1%) disengaged from PrEP care, and 176 (6.6%) were lost to follow-up. In multivariable analysis, high engagement in PrEP care at 1 year was associated with older age (P < .001), being born in Europe (P = .01), having a higher education level (P = .05), already undergoing PrEP at enrollment (P < .001), having a bacterial sexually transmitted infection in the prior year (P = .01), earlier enrollment in the study (P = .04), and using PrEP daily or switching between PrEP regimens within the first year (P < .001). Conclusions Younger GBMSM, those born outside Europe, and those who were PrEP naive had lower engagement rates in the cohort, requiring tailored support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liégeon et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: