Key result
Biventricular pacing decreased isovolumetric contraction time, and accelerometer-measured cardiac time intervals showed excellent correlation with echocardiography.
Why the study?
Can skin-attached accelerometers accurately measure cardiac time intervals during various pacing modes in patients with biventricular pacemakers compared to echocardiography?
Cross-Sectional (n=20)
Can skin-attached accelerometers accurately measure cardiac time intervals during various pacing modes in patients with biventricular pacemakers compared to echocardiography?
Skin-attached accelerometers provide a simple, noninvasive method that correlates excellently with echocardiography for measuring cardiac time intervals, potentially aiding in the optimization of biventricular pacing parameters.
Accelerometer intervals may aid noninvasive biventricular pacing assessment; leaves open prospective outcome validation versus echocardiography.
INTRODUCTION: Changes due to biventricular pacing have been documented by shortening of QRS duration and echocardiography. Compared to normal ventricular activation, the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) results in a significant change in cardiac cycle time intervals. Some of these have been used to quantify the underlying cardiac dyssynchrony, assess the effects of biventricular pacing, and guide programming of ventricular pacing devices. This study evaluates a simple noninvasive method using accelerometers attached to the skin to measure cardiac time intervals in biventricularly paced patients. METHODS: Ten patients with biventricular pacemakers previously implanted for congestive heart failure were paced in the AAI mode, then in atrioventricular (AV) sequential mode from the right and left ventricles followed by biventricular pacing. Simultaneous recordings were obtained by 2D, Doppler echocardiography as well as by accelerometers. Similar recordings were obtained from 10 gender, aged matched, normal controls during sinus rhythm. RESULTS: Compared to normals, heart failure patients paced in AAI mode had prolonged isovolumetric contraction time (IVCT), shorter ventricular ejection time (LVET), and prolonged isovolumetric relaxation (IVRT). With biventricular pacing the IVCT decreased, but the LVET and IVRT did not change significantly. There was excellent correlation between the echo and accelerometer-measured intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Shortening of the IVCT measured by an accelerometer is a consistent time interval change due to biventricular pacing that probably reflects more rapid acceleration of left ventricular ejection. The accelerometer may be useful to assess immediate efficacy of biventricular pacing during device implantation and optimize programmable time intervals such as AV and interventricular (VV) delays.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marcus et al. (2007) conducted a cross-sectional in Congestive heart failure (n=20). Biventricular pacing and accelerometer measurement vs. AAI mode and normal controls was evaluated on Cardiac time intervals (isovolumetric contraction time, left ventricular ejection time, isovolumetric relaxation time). Biventricular pacing decreased isovolumetric contraction time, and accelerometer-measured cardiac time intervals showed excellent correlation with echocardiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: