Key result
Structural glenoid autograft and allograft bone grafting in reverse shoulder arthroplasty resulted in 44% full and 50% partial incorporation overall, with no significant difference between groups.
Why the study?
The longevity of reverse shoulder arthroplasty constructs with structural glenoid bone grafting is of potential concern, particularly when using allograft bone.
Does structural glenoid autograft compared to allograft improve radiographic bone graft incorporation and component survival in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
Observational (n=34)
No
Does structural glenoid autograft compared to allograft improve radiographic bone graft incorporation and component survival in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
Glenoid bone grafting in conjunction with reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a reliable method to restore bone stock, with no significant difference in short-term component survival between auto- and allograft techniques.
Short-term radiographic stability supports glenoid grafting in primary and revision RSA; longer follow-up needed to confirm durability.
A structural glenoid bone graft may be utilized in conjuction with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in order to address native bone deficiency and/or lateralize the glenoid. The longevity of this type of construct is of potential concern especially with allograft bone grafting. We wanted to study the radiographic construct survival in primary and revision RSA with structural glenoid auto- and allograft bone grafting. We retrospectively identified all patients who had undergone RSA, with an encompassing structural bone graft under the metaglene bearing at Turku University Hospital between 2014 and 2019. All patients were called for follow-up and evaluated radiographically and clinically. Shoulders were divided into auto- and allograft groups and radiographic bone graft incorporation and component survival were used as primary outcome measures and between group differences were statistically analyzed. There were 38 shoulders/34 patients (out of 56) with a mean follow-up of 34 months. The mean age of patients at time of surgery was 69 years (SD 11). 26 auto- and 12 allografts were used at index surgery. At follow-up the bone graft was fully incorporated, partially incorporated and fully resorbed in 44 %, 50 % and 6 % of cases respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in bone graft incorporation between the groups and none of the prosthesis components showed radiographic signs of loosening. Glenoid bone grafting in conjunction with RSA is a safe and reliable method to restore the glenoid bone stock and secure the construct in short term follow-up. There may be no significant difference in component survival between auto- and allograft bone grafting techniques. Longer-term follow-up is needed to assess the final outcome with regard to these techniques. Level IV; Case series, Treatment Study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lehtimäki et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Native bone deficiency in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (n=34). Structural glenoid autograft vs. Structural glenoid allograft was evaluated on Radiographic bone graft incorporation and component survival. Structural glenoid autograft and allograft bone grafting in reverse shoulder arthroplasty resulted in 44% full and 50% partial incorporation overall, with no significant difference between groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: