Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
// Limo Chen 1,* , Bertal H Aktas 1,2,* , Yibo Wang 1 , Xiaoying He 1,3 , Rupam Sahoo 1 , Nancy Zhang 1 , Severine Denoyelle 1 , Eihab Kabha 1 , Hongwei Yang 1 , Revital Yefidoff Freedman 1 , Jeffrey G Supko 1,3 , Michael Chorev 1,2 , Gerhard Wagner 1 , and Jose A Halperin 1,2 1 Harvard Medical School 2 Brigham and Women’s Hospital 3 Massachusetts General Hospital * These authors are equal contributors Correspondence: Jose A. Halperin , email: // Keywords : Translation, eIF4F, eIF4E, ternary complex, eIF2 Received : August 09, 2012, Accepted : August 24, 2012, Published : August 25, 2012 Abstract Translation initiation factors are over-expressed and/or activated in many human cancers and may contribute to their genesis and/or progression. Removal of physiologic restraints on translation initiation causes malignant transformation. Conversely, restoration of physiological restrains on translation initiation reverts malignant phenotypes. Here, we extensively characterize the anti-cancer activity of two small molecule inhibitors of translation initiation: #1181, which targets the eIF2∙GTP∙Met-tRNA i ternary complex, and 4EGI-1, which targets the eIF4F complex. In vitro, both molecules inhibit translation initiation, abrogate preferentially translation of mRNAs coding for oncogenic proteins, and inhibit proliferation of human cancer cells. In vivo, both #1181 and 4EGI-1 strongly inhibit growth of human breast and melanoma cancer xenografts without any apparent macroscopic- or microscopic-toxicity. Mechanistically, #1181 phosphorylates eIF2α while 4EGI-1 disrupts eIF4G/eIF4E interaction in the tumors excised from mice treated with these agents. These data indicate that inhibition of translation initiation is a new paradigm in cancer therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: