Key result
Complex endovascular repair of intact thoracic aortic aneurysms was associated with significantly higher 30-day mortality (26.9% vs. 8.2%) and stroke rates (7.7% vs. 1.2%) compared to thoracoabdominal repair.
Why the study?
Does complex endovascular repair of intact thoracic aortic aneurysms compared to thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms result in different mortality and complication rates in real-world practice?
Observational (n=984)
Yes
Does complex endovascular repair of intact thoracic aortic aneurysms compared to thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms result in different mortality and complication rates in real-world practice?
Absolute Event Rate: 26.9% vs 8.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Real-world claims data reveal significantly higher mortality and stroke rates following complex endovascular repair of intact thoracic aortic aneurysms compared to thoracoabdominal aneurysms, contrasting with the more favorable outcomes typically reported in single-center studies.
The complex endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms and dissections with fenestrated or branched stent grafts (FB-EVAR) remains challenging for interventional vascular surgery. To date, the evidence regarding treatment patterns and outcome measures consists of single center studies; however, it might be reasonable to validate results with multicenter real-world evidence. Health insurance claims data from Germany’s third largest insurance provider, DAK-Gesundheit, were used to determine outcomes following FB-EVAR of non-ruptured thoracic aorta (TA) or thoracoabdominal including pararenal abdominal (TAA) aorta. The study included patients operated between January 2008 and April 2017. Included were 984 patients (18.1% female) who underwent FB-EVAR. Patients with treatment of the TA were younger (71.7 vs. 73.2 years, p < 0.001) and more often female (38.5% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.001) as compared to patients with treatment of TAA. In the TA group peripheral arterial disease was less frequent compared to the TAA group (67.3% vs. 80.4%, p = 0.036). Mortality was significantly ( p < 0.001) higher following repair of the TAA compared to the TA at discharge (17.3% vs. 4.6%), at 30 days (26.9% vs. 8.2%) and at 90 days (34.6% vs. 10.1%). Patients with treatment of the TAA suffered more often from stroke as compared to the TA group (7.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.002). In this large-scale German analysis of claims data, multicenter real-world evidence was different from single center studies regarding patient risk-factors and outcome measures. Validated multicenter registry studies could help to further investigate this topic in times of increasing procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Behrendt et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Intact thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (n=984). Complex endovascular repair of thoracic aorta (TA) vs. Complex endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aorta (TAA) was evaluated on 30-day mortality (p=<0.001). Complex endovascular repair of intact thoracic aortic aneurysms was associated with significantly higher 30-day mortality (26.9% vs. 8.2%) and stroke rates (7.7% vs. 1.2%) compared to thoracoabdominal repair.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: