Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 2, 2006Neurourology and UrodynamicsOpen Access

Validation of the short forms of the incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ‐7) and the urogenital distress inventory (UDI‐6) in a Turkish population

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ÇÇÇetin ÇamYeditepe UniversityMSMustafa SakallıBartin UniversityPAPınar AyMarmara University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Çam et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9feab6dc8f40e47bd4c5f4https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20292
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Diagnostic Dilemma: When Urodynamic Findings Differ from the Clinical Impression1983 · 46 citations
  2. 2The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation sub‐committee of the International Continence Society2002 · 8,322 citations
  3. 3Quality of life and urinary incontinence1995 · 94 citations
  4. 4Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: The incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory1995 · 1,438 citations