Key result
A standard rapid aspirin desensitization protocol was successful in 95.4% of patients with aspirin sensitivity undergoing coronary angiography.
Why the study?
Does a rapid aspirin desensitization protocol safely and effectively allow aspirin use in patients with coronary artery disease and aspirin sensitivity?
Observational (n=330)
Yes
Does a rapid aspirin desensitization protocol safely and effectively allow aspirin use in patients with coronary artery disease and aspirin sensitivity?
A standard 5.5-hour rapid aspirin desensitization protocol is safe and highly effective (95.4% success rate) in patients with coronary artery disease and aspirin hypersensitivity, allowing for continued aspirin therapy.
Supports rapid ASA desensitization as feasible for CAD patients needing angiography/PCI; leaves open confirmation via randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: There are limited data on aspirin (ASA) desensitization for patients with coronary artery disease. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a standard rapid desensitization protocol in patients with ASA sensitivity undergoing coronary angiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a prospective, multicenter, observational study including 7 Italian centers including patients with a history of ASA sensitivity undergoing coronary angiography with intent to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 330 patients with history of ASA sensitivity with known/suspected stable coronary artery disease or presenting with an acute coronary syndrome, including ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction were enrolled. Adverse effects to aspirin included urticaria (n=177, 53.6%), angioedema (n=69, 20.9%), asthma (n=65, 19.7%), and anaphylactic reaction (n=19, 5.8%). Among patients with urticaria/angioedema, 13 patients (3.9%) had a history of idiopathic chronic urticaria. All patients underwent a rapid ASA (5.5 hours) desensitization procedure. The desensitization procedure was performed before cardiac catheterization in all patients, except for those (n=78, 23.6%) presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction who underwent the desensitization after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 235 patients (71%) of the overall study population. The desensitization procedure was successful in 315 patients (95.4%) and in all patients with a history of anaphylactic reaction. Among the 15 patients (4.6%) who did not successfully respond to the desensitization protocol, adverse reactions were minor and responded to treatment with corticosteroids and antihistamines. Among patients with successful in-hospital ASA desensitization, 253 patients (80.3%) continued ASA for at least 12 months. Discontinuation of ASA in the 62 patients (19.7%) who had responded to the desensitization protocol was because of medical decision and not because of hypersensitivity reactions. CONCLUSIONS: A standard rapid desensitization protocol is safe and effective across a broad spectrum of patients, irrespective of the type of aspirin sensitivity manifestation, with indications to undergo coronary angiography with intent to perform percutaneous coronary intervention. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02848339.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rossini et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease with aspirin sensitivity (n=330). Standard rapid aspirin desensitization protocol was evaluated on Successful desensitization. A standard rapid aspirin desensitization protocol was successful in 95.4% of patients with aspirin sensitivity undergoing coronary angiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: