Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The success of prostheses is highly dependent upon load transfer and bone stresses. Reflection photoelasticity is a viable technique for measuring stress patterns in vitro. However, when a cementless stem is tested, the resultant stresses under load are the sum of the implantation stresses and of those induced by load application. Separating these two components is a critical issue that so far has not been thoroughly solved using photoelasticity. Implantation strains and strain under load were measured separately by a suitable procedure: the photoelastic coating was applied to the femur after stem press-fitting. Thus, when an external load is applied (e.g. to simulate a physiological activity), the fringe patterns indicate the effect of the external load alone. Implantation strains are measured independently, after load removal; the stem is extracted and stresses are released, causing a new fringe pattern. The method was used to investigate the stress pattern caused by press-fitting of two cementless hip stems and that caused by a load applied to the implanted femora. Different isochromatic and isoclinic patterns were observed for the strain distribution caused by load application and by press-fitting for two stem designs. Differences in press-fit pattern and load transfer were successfully detected between the two designs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cristofolini et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: